|
Internal Assessment
The Internal Assessment (IA) is a collection
of work completed by the student during the course of the year.
Each candidate must keep a portfolio (lab notebook), which is a compilation
of all investigations carried out, and summarized on IBO form 4/PSOW (Group
4 -- Experimental Science, Practical Scheme of Work). HL students
in each science are required to demonstrate 60 hours of laboratory/field
investigations in their portfolios, SL students in each science are required
to demonstrate 40 hours of laboratory/field investigations in their portfolios.
The portfolio must include:
- A copy of the candidate's form 4/PSOW
- A contents page
- Instruction sheets and/or summaries of
verbal instructions relating to each investigation
- Evidence of the candidate's involvement
in the Group 4 Project
- Observations/drawings/diagrams
- Tables, graphs and 'partial' write-ups
- 'Full' write-ups of 3-6 investigations
The Portfolio is also likely
to include:
- Data analysis made in the field/laboratory
- Outcomes of data manipulation exercises
- Results of computer simulations
There are eight assessment criteria which
are used to assess the work of higher level candidates:
Each
of the assessment criteria can be separated into two or three aspects
as shown below. Descriptions are provided to indicate what is expected
in order to meet the requirements of a given aspect completely (c)
and partially (p). A description is also given for circumstances
in which the requirements are not satisfied, not at all (n).
|
Planning (a)
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Defining the problem
or research question
|
Formulating a hypothesis
or prediction
|
Selecting variables
|
|
Complete
|
Identifies a focused
problem or research question.
|
Relates the hypothesis
or prediction directly to the research question and explains it,
quantitatively where appropriate.
|
Selects the relevant
independent and controlled variable(s).
|
|
Partial
|
States the problem or
research question, but it is unclear or incomplete.
|
States the hypothesis
or prediction but does not explain it.
|
Selects some relevant
variables.
|
|
Not at all
|
Does not state the problem
or research question or repeats the general aim provided
by the teacher.
|
Does not state a hypothesis
or prediction.
|
Does not select any relevant
variables.
|
|
Planning (b)
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Selecting appropriate
apparatus or materials*
|
Designing a method for
the control of variables
|
Designing a method for
the collection of sufficient relevant data
|
|
Complete
|
Selects appropriate apparatus
or materials.
|
Describes a method that
allows for the control of the variables.
|
Describes a method that
allows for the collection of sufficient relevant data.
|
|
Partial
|
Selects some appropriate
apparatus or materials.
|
Describes a method that
makes some attempt to control the variables.
|
Describes a method that
allows for the collection of insufficient relevant data.
|
|
Not at all
|
Does not select any apparatus
or materials.
|
Describes a method that
does not allow for the control of the variables.
|
Describes a method that
does not allow any relevant data to be collected.
|
|
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Collecting and recording
raw data
|
Organizing and presenting
raw data
|
|
Complete
|
Records appropriate raw
data (qualitative and/or quantitative), including units and uncertainties
where necessary.
|
Presents raw data clearly,
allowing for easy interpretation.
|
|
Partial
|
Records some appropriate
raw data.
|
Presents raw data but
does not allow for easy interpretation.
|
|
Not at all
|
Does not record any appropriate
raw data.
|
Does not present raw
data or presents it incomprehensibly.
|
|
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Processing raw data
|
Presenting processed
data
|
|
Complete
|
Processes the raw data
correctly.
|
Presents processed data
appropriately, helping interpretation and, where relevant, takes
into account errors and uncertainties.
|
|
Partial
|
Some raw data is processed
correctly.
|
Presents processed data
appropriately but with some errors and/or omissions.
|
|
Not at all
|
No processing of raw
data is carried out or major errors are made in processing.
|
Presents processed data
inappropriately or incomprehensibly.
|
|
Conclusion and Evaluation
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Drawing conclusions
|
Evaluating procedure(s)
and results
|
Improving the investigation
|
|
Complete
|
Gives a valid conclusion,
based on the correct interpretation of the results, with an explanation
and, where appropriate, compares results with literature values.
|
Evaluates procedure(s)
and results including limitations, weaknesses or errors.
|
Identifies weaknesses
and states realistic suggestions to improve the investigation.
|
|
Partial
|
States a conclusion that
has some validity.
|
Evaluates procedure(s)
and results but misses some obvious limitations or errors.
|
Suggests only simplistic
improvements.
|
|
Not at all
|
Draws a conclusion that
misinterprets the results.
|
The evaluation is superficial
or irrelevant.
|
Suggests unrealistic
improvements.
|
|
Manipulative Skills
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Carrying out techniques
safely
|
Following a variety of
instructions*
|
|
Complete
|
Is competent and methodical
in the use of the technique(s) and the equipment, and pays attention
to safety issues.
|
Follows the instructions
accurately, adapting to new circumstances (seeking assistance
when required).
|
|
Partial
|
Requires assistance in
the use of a routine technique. Works in a safe manner with occasional
prompting.
|
Follows the instructions
but requires assistance.
|
|
Not at all
|
Does not carry out the
technique(s) or misuses the equipment, showing no regard
for safety.
|
Does not follow the instructions
or requires constant supervision.
|
* Instructions may be given
in a variety of forms: oral, written worksheets, diagrams, photographs,
videos, flowcharts, audiotapes, models, computer programs etc.
|
Personal Skills (a)
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Working within a team*
|
Recognizing the contributions
of others
|
Exchanging and integrating
ideas
|
|
Complete
|
Collaborates with others,
recognizing their needs, in order to complete the task.
|
Expects, actively seeks
and acknowledges the views of others.
|
Exchanges ideas with
others, integrating them into the task.
|
|
Partial
|
Requires guidance to
collaborate with others.
|
Acknowledges some views.
|
Exchanges ideas with
others but requires guidance in integrating them into the task.
|
|
Not at all
|
Is unsuccessful when
working with others.
|
Disregards views of others.
|
Does not contribute.
|
|
Personal Skills (b)
|
|
|
ASPECTS
|
|
LEVELS
|
Approaching scientific
investigations with self-motivation and perseverance
|
Working in an ethical
manner
|
Paying attention to environmental
impact
|
|
Complete
|
Approaches the investigation
with self-motivation and follows it through to completion.
|
Pays considerable attention
to the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach
to materials (living or non-living).
|
Pays considerable attention
to the environmental impact of the investigation.
|
|
Partial
|
Approaches the investigation
with self-motivation or follows it through to completion.
|
Pays some attention to
the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach
to materials (living or non-living).
|
Pays some attention to
the environmental impact of the investigation.
|
|
Not at all
|
Lacks perseverance and
motivation.
|
Pays little attention
to the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach
to materials (living or non-living).
|
Pays little attention
to the environmental impact of the investigation
|
For a particular criterion, a
piece of work is judged to see whether the requirements of each aspect
have been fulfilled completely, partially or not at all. This can then
be translated into an achievement level 0, 1, 2 or 3 using the achievement
level matrixes below. The lowest level of achievement is represented by
0, and 3 represents the highest level of achievement.
Planning (a), Planning (b),
Conclusion and Evaluation, Personal Skills (a), Personal Skills (b)
The matrix below refers to
planning (a), planning (b), conclusion and evaluation,
personal skills (a) and personal skills (b), where each
criterion has three aspects.
|
Level
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
|
Completely
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
|
Level
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Completely
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Data Collection, Data Processing
and Presentation, Manipulative Skills
The matrix below applies to
data collection, data processing and presentation, and
manipulative skills, where each criterion has two aspects.
|
Level
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Completely
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not at all
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
Aspects
|
|